Site search

Blogroll

3000 Votes
Andrew Bartlett
Antony Loewenstein
Audrey of Adelaide
Australians All
Austrolabe
Balneus
Bitch Ph.D.
BoltWatch
Brian Flemming
Bush Telegraph
Catallaxy
Club Troppo
Counteract Now
Crazy Brave
David Jeffery
David Tiley
Deb Foskey
Denialism
Feminism 101
GrodsCorp
Human Rights Act
Irfan Yusuf
Jane Clark
Jeremy Sear
John Quiggin
Josh Wolf
Kalkadoon.org
Language Log
Larvatus Prodeo
LeftWrites
Legal Soap Box
Machine Gun Keyboard
Miss Politics Australia
New Int. Blogs
Nexus Six
Paradigm Oz
Peter Black
Peter Campbell
Peter Martin
Planet Irf
Polemica
Possums Pollytics
Reasons You Will Hate Me
Rodney Croome
Sauer-Thompson
South Sea Republic
Spinopsys
StinkyJournalism.org
Suki Has An Opinion
Talk it Out
Talk It Out
Tama Leaver
The Dogs Bollocks
The Indian Mutiny
The Partisan
The Poll Bludger
The Road to Surfdom
Thinkers Podium
Tim Dunlop
Tim Lambert
Tug Boat Potemkin
Typing is NOT Activism
Watermelon Rant
Webdiary
Woolly Days


Featured Content

Profile: Mick Towke
Profile: Greg Smith
Profile: Paul Gibson

Zimbabwe as head of UN body for sustainable development is a good thing.

The sick puppies at The Economist applaud the choice of Zimbabwe as chair of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development with the perverse but brilliant reasons that "making bad countries run good causes is actually a promising notion" (2007-05-19 p13), and citing the taming of Libya from its chairing of the UN Human Rights Commission.

The argue that this encourages scrutiny of the body, and criticism of the host nation, and make other suggestions, including the following:

I’ve got another suggestion in the same spirit: given our actions, Australia should host the UN High Commission for Refugees.


Stories the server thinks are related:
>>The Decision NOT to blockade
>>Blogging for Choice: Why I’m Pro-Choice, on this the 22nd of Jan 07
>>Answering all your questions Dr Paul
>>Zimbabwe? Sanctions!


Comments

resta suma Comment from Kieran
Time: May 21, 2007, 4:04 pm

That reasoning is as bad as libertarians who advocate supporting carbon taxation, because it might be a way to sneak in cuts to more progressive taxes.

resta suma Comment from Dave Bath
Time: May 21, 2007, 4:25 pm

Here’s an example (N.Korea for IAEA HQ):

The IAEA’s staff might find the austere delights of Pyongyang a bit of a contrast from the cosy comforts of Vienna, but the arrival of dozens of nuclear snoopers would certainly make it harder for the regime there to cover its tracks.

Or on the ILO:

Based in Beijing, the ILO would find many more chains to loosen than it does in the worker’s paradise of Switzerland.

Their final words?

Sudan has not signed up to it, otherwise the International Criminal Court could be packing its briefcases for Khartoum. Sadly, when it comes to regimes that serially abuse their people, there is plenty of competition.

Write a comment





Close
E-mail It