Reflecting on the Bracks legacy
I was a child of the Kennett years. I was just old enough to know what was going on as Kennett slashed and burned pretty much everything much everything that required public funding in the early 1990s. My teacher parents saw several of the schools they had taught at closed, many of their colleagues forced out, and soon chose to jump on the bandwagon and get out while they could. I remember the stakes going into the 1999 election - on a statewide level, we had madness like the partial privatisation of schools, and on a local level back in Geelong, we had the environmental-disaster-in-waiting of the Belmont Common rowing course development. I barely knew who Steve Bracks was, and I certainly didn’t expect Labor to win that year.
I don’t think I’ll ever forget September 18, 1999. There had been a joke going around in the preceding weeks about the Victorian Labor Party, the Carlton Football Club and the Melbourne Storm all being doomed in their encounters that weekend. (They all won.) Then it came clear that Kennett was indeed gone - in one fell swoop, the school privatisation was dead, the Belmont Common fiasco was dead, and Labor were finally back in government - something sealed by the Frankston East by-election a couple of weeks later.
Throughout the first term, between 1999 and 2002, I still had pretty high hopes for the Bracks government. Some of the excesses of the Kennett years were repealed, funding was re-injected into most sectors to undo some of the damage. We saw clear progress like the reopening of the Bairnsdale and Ararat rail lines, promises to extend and reopen several more, and progress on badly needed infrastructure projects like the reconstruction of Spencer Street Station. We saw small progressive steps on queer issues, a real attempt at saving the Snowy River, and improvements to laws prohibiting discrimination and vilification. It wasn’t radical, but at least it was progress.
Going into the 2002 election, I was still well on board with the Bracks government. I remember cheering as the sheer depth of the electoral rout emerged on election night, as my hometown seat fell into Labor hands for the first time in history, and for the first time, Labor wrested control of the Legislative Council from the Liberals. This paved the way for the one big success of that term - Bracks’ commitment to reforming the Legislative Council, and doing so in a way that allowed the minor parties into the game for the first time in Victoria’s history. It’s probably that, I think, that Bracks will be most remembered for. Apart from that, however, progress stalled in the second term. Most of the rail infrastructure projects wound up on the backburner, we had utter fiascos like the “road to nowhere” Geelong bypass, and I can barely remember any notable legislative progress at all. Bracks and his ministers developed the sort of arrogance we’d previously seen in the Kennett years. We saw utter inaction on abortion and gay rights, and saw the bizarre sight of the Liberals threatening to out-left them on both (and even, bizarrely, the DLP on the latter). It was this sort of inaction and arrogance that saw me preference the Liberals in 2006 - something which I’d have never expected to do four years earlier.
This final term was shaping up even worse, and I can safely say that my opinion of Bracks couldn’t have gotten much lower. However, in his last days in office, we did see him having the strength to stare down the Commonwealth over control of the Murray-Darling Basin, which was great to see. It doesn’t change the fact, however, that Bracks will leave behind a legacy of inaction and missed opportunities. All of this said, however, I’m a bit uncertain about what lies ahead in the wake of his departure. While I’m tempted to say “good riddance” about losing Bracks, Brumby is very much an unknown in terms of leadership potential - no one thought he had a snowball’s chance of hell of winning government from opposition, and Bracks’ departure was so sudden that I don’t think anyone has given much though as to what sort of Premier Brumby might make.
Stories the server thinks are related:
Posted: by Rebecca July 28th, 2007 under Politics, Victoria.
Comments: 4
Comments
Comment from Dave Bath
Time: July 28, 2007, 2:38 pm
Well, this person was a child of the Bolte gov (and the Ronald Ryan controversy), and I’d say the main legacy of the Bracks government for the better was the reform (you noted) of the upper house.
Other than that, (and remember I’m a lefty) the concept of open and accountable government has almost disappeared under Bracks after being merely broken by Kennet. Brumby, as the real “power behind the throne” is unlikely to change, and future governments from the majors will want to retain the power and secrecy.
Yes - funding for education and health has been partially restored, but control of infrastructure still decreases with the Brumby-sanctioned PPPs (public private partnerships) that dramatically increase total state costs of providing infrastructure services.
What I’ll miss? The long run of premiers and opposition leaders who were Geelong supporters!
![]()
Comment from Kieran
Time: July 28, 2007, 3:54 pm
He was a small c conservative, a man I jokely referred to as Steve Kennett. Not as bad as Jeff, but a Kennett (c*nt) none the less.
Oh everyone called him a nice guy, but I didn’t crave a nice guy, I wanted to see a leader with vision for what the future could be.
Comment from Sam
Time: August 2, 2007, 8:09 pm
Labor went mad in the last part of Bracks’ reign.
The Geelong By-Pass (the road to nowhere) was a prime example.
How could anyone in their right mind have suggested this option, whenthe links to the Surfcoast Highway had already had houses built on them. How can you end a freeway in a T-bar dead end ?
The road had to go out further and then sweep around to join up the Surfcoast Highway and then cross the river to join the Bellarine Highway. This would have circumnavigated Geelong and allowed access for everyone. A thought for the future would have been to reserve land out to Point Henry in case a bridge would have been built in the future across Corio Bay. This would have given two options to by-pass Geelong.
Instead, plans are to join the By-Pass to the Anglesea Rd. which is a C Class road. This will have to be re-built to four lane capacity. What a muddle!
Whoever’s responsible for the decision should be named but will we ever find out ? No sir.
I could go on and on. Public transport, etc.
Brumby will have to lift the Vic. Government’s game
Comment from Dave Bath
Time: August 6, 2007, 2:07 pm
Sam: A bridge across Corio Bay to Point Henry (opening up access to the Bellarine Peninsula) would be fairly easy: until dredging a channel for shipping, it was possible to drive cattle across the bay at low tide (and even now the “flush time” for Corio Bay is 3 years).
As to public transport in the region, some improvements have been made (e.g. the Marshall station opening), but a rail spur to Deakin Uni through Groveldale would have been a good idea. Re-opening the rail to the Bellarine Peninsula (we’d catch the Queenscliff train when I was a kid) would be another good thing. Public transport in the Geelong region is totally broken and makes it incredibly dependent on private cars.
The Geelong Bypass will only make the suburban sprawl in Geelong take over good productive land which should be reserved for agriculture and constrain growth in total food kilometres. The loss of grain production around Lara, the loss of veg/dairy/lamb around Waurn Ponds is a huge waste.
Write a comment