Site search

Blogroll

3000 Votes
Andrew Bartlett
Antony Loewenstein
Audrey of Adelaide
Australians All
Austrolabe
Balneus
Bitch Ph.D.
BoltWatch
Brian Flemming
Bush Telegraph
Catallaxy
Club Troppo
Counteract Now
Crazy Brave
David Jeffery
David Tiley
Deb Foskey
Denialism
Feminism 101
GrodsCorp
Human Rights Act
Irfan Yusuf
Jane Clark
Jeremy Sear
John Quiggin
Josh Wolf
Kalkadoon.org
Language Log
Larvatus Prodeo
LeftWrites
Legal Soap Box
Machine Gun Keyboard
Miss Politics Australia
New Int. Blogs
Nexus Six
Paradigm Oz
Peter Black
Peter Campbell
Peter Martin
Planet Irf
Polemica
Possums Pollytics
Reasons You Will Hate Me
Rodney Croome
Sauer-Thompson
South Sea Republic
Spinopsys
StinkyJournalism.org
Suki Has An Opinion
Talk it Out
Talk It Out
Tama Leaver
The Dogs Bollocks
The Indian Mutiny
The Partisan
The Poll Bludger
The Road to Surfdom
Thinkers Podium
Tim Dunlop
Tim Lambert
Tug Boat Potemkin
Typing is NOT Activism
Watermelon Rant
Webdiary
Woolly Days


Featured Content

Profile: Mick Towke
Profile: Greg Smith
Profile: Paul Gibson

Has the Greens vote peaked?

The Peel by-election has seen only a marginal increase in the Green’s primary vote, inspite of renewed concern for environmental issues in the public arena.

The 2006 Victorian election saw the Greens pick up a handful of upper house seats, but that was because of electoral reform, and not because on any signifigant increase in support.

So what do you think, have we reached the extent of Green support in the community? Could the the Greens vote suffer a decline in 2007? Have some section of the voting public bought the recent major party green wash on global warming?

Post a comment with your thoughts.


Stories the server thinks are related:
>>A couple of new regular features at the Dead Roo…
>>The CLP win in Greatorex, albeit with a low turnout
>>Greens New Website
>>Bob Brown: Peter, you’re a sell out.


Comments

resta suma Comment from Kieran
Time: February 4, 2007, 12:15 pm

Whoa! Poll bludger is now reporting a 2.9% swing to the Greens, which is over a third of their 2005 result of 6.4%.

I’ve heard of the Greens vote increasing later in the count (Greens voters are more likely to postal vote, Greens voters are more likely to vote at larger booths which take longer to count), but that’s just massive.

Who know’s, maybe the long term dream of Green government is alive and kicking?

resta suma Pingback from The Dead Roo - » A couple of new regular features at the Dead Roo…
Time: February 4, 2007, 2:18 pm

[…] arse for posts when you can’t be bothered. As such, the Dead Roo will now feature a regular Weekend Question Thread. Rebecca has got dibbs on posing next weekends question, mainly because mine […]

resta suma Comment from The Poll Bludger
Time: February 5, 2007, 2:53 pm

Actually, postal votes came in first at this by-election for some reason -and in Peel at least, the Greens don’t appear to do particularly well here (6 or 7 per cent). That largely explains why my early swing figure would not have been so good for the Greens. Unfortunately, I didn’t entirely have my act together on Saturday and and my early primary vote swing figures were not comparing like with like - so the 6 or 7 per cent pre-poll/postals were being measured against the overall total from 2005. The Greens vote was actually up in every booth, by between 1.0 per cent and 4.4 per cent.

resta suma Comment from Kieran
Time: February 5, 2007, 5:27 pm

Another factor to consider is that the Greens usually expect as a Greens supporter I ususally expect the party* to poll signifigantly better in a bi-election (without the focus on who will form government, more latent Greens supporters won’t be delluded by the supposed importance of the major parties), this combined with the fact that we also expect our vote to increase at any election over time (the idea being that as time goes on, more latent Greens supporters get totally fed up with the major parties that they finally give the Greens their first preference), could make this a poor result for the Greens. But then again Peel defied everyone’s established ideas about tendencies in bi-elections.

*repeat after me Kieran, “I am not the party spokesperson!”

Write a comment





Close
E-mail It